MAUPIN v. HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, 12-1203. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120718090
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michelle D. Maupin appeals the district court's order denying the motion for permissive joinder and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maupin v. Howard Cnty. Pub. Schs., No. 1:10-cv-02659-BEL (D. Md. Feb. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michelle D. Maupin appeals the district court's order denying the motion for permissive joinder and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maupin v. Howard Cnty. Pub. Schs., No. 1:10-cv-02659-BEL (D. Md. Feb. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately p..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michelle D. Maupin appeals the district court's order denying the motion for permissive joinder and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maupin v. Howard Cnty. Pub. Schs., No. 1:10-cv-02659-BEL (D. Md. Feb. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
