Boucher v. Michigan, 17-13233. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190517c50
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 16, 2019
Latest Update: May 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE DAVID M. LAWSON , District Judge . Presently before the Court is the report issued on April 26, 2019 by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), recommending that the Court grant the several motions to dismiss filed in this case and dismiss any remaining claims sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Although the magistrate judge's report stated that the parties to this acti
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE DAVID M. LAWSON , District Judge . Presently before the Court is the report issued on April 26, 2019 by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), recommending that the Court grant the several motions to dismiss filed in this case and dismiss any remaining claims sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Although the magistrate judge's report stated that the parties to this actio..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the report issued on April 26, 2019 by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court grant the several motions to dismiss filed in this case and dismiss any remaining claims sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Although the magistrate judge's report stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 66) is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that the defendants' motions to dismiss (ECF No. 53, 54, 55, and 56) are GRANTED and that any remaining claims are DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
It is further ORDERED that the amended complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
