BECK v. CITY OF PLAINWELL, 1:11-cv-735. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20120504947
Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JANET T. NEFF, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed April 10, 2012 by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt 112) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER OR
Summary: ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JANET T. NEFF, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed April 10, 2012 by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt 112) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORD..
More
ORDER APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JANET T. NEFF, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed April 10, 2012 by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt 112) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Reed's Motion for Dismissal on the Pleadings (Dkt 36) and Defendant DeHart's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt 40) are G RANTED and Plaintiff's complaint against Defendants Reed and DeHart is DISMISSED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that upon review of Plaintiff's claims, this Court can discern no good-faith basis for an appeal and so certifies in accordance with McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir. 1997).
Source: Leagle
