ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #11) AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF #10)

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.

In this action, Plaintiff Susan Leblanc challenges the denial of her application for disability benefits. (See Compl., ECF #1.) Leblanc and the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner") have now filed cross-motions for summary judgment. (See ECF ## 10, 11.)

On February 25, 2018, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant the Commissioner's motion and deny Leblanc's motion (the "R&R"). (See ECF #12.) At the conclusion of the R&R, the Magistrate Judge informed the parties that if they wanted to seek review of her recommendation, they needed to file specific objections with the Court within fourteen days. (See id. at Pg. ID 526-27.)

Leblanc has not filed any objections to the R&R. The failure to file objections to an R&R waives any further right to appeal. See Howard v. Sec'y of Health and Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to an R&R releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, because Leblanc has failed to file any objections to the R&R, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's recommendation to grant the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that (1) the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #11) is GRANTED and (2) Leblanc's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #10) is DENIED.