COLONNA v. HANNERS, 11-1691. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20111122159
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 22, 2011
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Michael Hanners appeals the district court's order confirming the arbitration award entered in Appellees' favor and denying his motions to dismiss and for a continuance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Colonna v. Hanners , No. 8:10-cv-01899-AW (D. Md., filed June 1, entered June 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argumen
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Michael Hanners appeals the district court's order confirming the arbitration award entered in Appellees' favor and denying his motions to dismiss and for a continuance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Colonna v. Hanners , No. 8:10-cv-01899-AW (D. Md., filed June 1, entered June 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
James Michael Hanners appeals the district court's order confirming the arbitration award entered in Appellees' favor and denying his motions to dismiss and for a continuance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Colonna v. Hanners, No. 8:10-cv-01899-AW (D. Md., filed June 1, entered June 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
