Filed: Oct. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER (FOURTH REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4. Plaintiff Konami Gaming, Inc. ("Konami" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant Marks Studios, LLC d/b/a Gimmie Games ("Marks Studios" or "Defendant") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS , the parties to this action filed a proposed joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (the "Scheduling Order") on December 30, 2014, ( Docket no. 24) ; WHEREAS,
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER (FOURTH REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4. Plaintiff Konami Gaming, Inc. ("Konami" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant Marks Studios, LLC d/b/a Gimmie Games ("Marks Studios" or "Defendant") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS , the parties to this action filed a proposed joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (the "Scheduling Order") on December 30, 2014, ( Docket no. 24) ; WHEREAS, ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER (FOURTH REQUEST)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4. Plaintiff Konami Gaming, Inc. ("Konami" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant Marks Studios, LLC d/b/a Gimmie Games ("Marks Studios" or "Defendant") hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, the parties to this action filed a proposed joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (the "Scheduling Order") on December 30, 2014, (Docket no. 24);
WHEREAS, the Court so ordered the Scheduling Order on January 27, 2015 (Docket no. 31);
WHEREAS, the parties' first request to modify the Scheduling Order was on February 6, 2015 (Docket No. 35);
WHEREAS, the Court approved the proposed modification of the Scheduling Order on February 9, 2015 (Docket No. 37);
WHEREAS, the parties' second request to modify the Scheduling Order was on May 18, 2015 (Docket No. 65);
WHEREAS, the Court approved the proposed modification of the Scheduling Order on May 19, 2015 (Docket No. 66);
WHEREAS, the parties' third request to modify the Scheduling Order was on July 23, 2015 (Docket No. 73);
WHEREAS, the Court approved the proposed modification of the Scheduling Order on July 29, 2015 (Docket No. 75);
WHEREAS, in the interest of judicial economy, the parties have agreed to stipulate to simultaneous exchange of opening and responsive claim construction briefs.
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to stipulate to a modification of the case schedule, to allow the parties sufficient time to resolve their disputes;
WHEREAS, this is the parties' second request to modify the Scheduling Order;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the named parties hereto, that the schedule in the Scheduling Order will be amended as follows:
Event Basis Proposed Date
Simultaneous Opening Claim Construction Briefs LR 16.1-16 October 21, 2015
Exchange (75 pages)
Simultaneous Responsive Claim Construction Brief LR 16.1-16 November 6, 2015
Exchange (50 pages)
Markman Hearing N/A To be Set By Court
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that nothing herein affects either party's ability to seek to further modify the case schedule or alters the obligations and requirements included in the Scheduling Order and that this Stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD,
ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
