Filed: Jul. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER TOM S. LEE, District Judge. This cause is before the court on the magistrate judge's June 13, 2012 report and recommendation. No objections having been filed and having reviewed the report and recommendation, the court hereby adopts, as its own opinion, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Michael T. Parker entered on or about June 13, 2012, be, and the same is hereby, adopt
Summary: ORDER TOM S. LEE, District Judge. This cause is before the court on the magistrate judge's June 13, 2012 report and recommendation. No objections having been filed and having reviewed the report and recommendation, the court hereby adopts, as its own opinion, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Michael T. Parker entered on or about June 13, 2012, be, and the same is hereby, adopte..
More
ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on the magistrate judge's June 13, 2012 report and recommendation. No objections having been filed and having reviewed the report and recommendation, the court hereby adopts, as its own opinion, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.
Based on the foregoing, it is ordered that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Michael T. Parker entered on or about June 13, 2012, be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this court. Accordingly, it is ordered that commissioner's motion to affirm is granted and that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied.
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED.
