U.S. v. Walker, 12-cr-20287. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190306e40
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Dkt. 963) MARK A. GOLDSMITH , District Judge . This Court previously ordered the Government to respond to Defendant Jatimothy Walker's motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 no later than March 11, 2019. 1/8/2019 Order (Dkt. 959). The Government now requests a thirty-day extension (Dkt. 963). The Government's motion is granted. The Government shall file its response no later than April 10, 2019. Walker filed a request that this Court stay his
Summary: ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Dkt. 963) MARK A. GOLDSMITH , District Judge . This Court previously ordered the Government to respond to Defendant Jatimothy Walker's motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 no later than March 11, 2019. 1/8/2019 Order (Dkt. 959). The Government now requests a thirty-day extension (Dkt. 963). The Government's motion is granted. The Government shall file its response no later than April 10, 2019. Walker filed a request that this Court stay his c..
More
ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Dkt. 963)
MARK A. GOLDSMITH, District Judge.
This Court previously ordered the Government to respond to Defendant Jatimothy Walker's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 no later than March 11, 2019. 1/8/2019 Order (Dkt. 959). The Government now requests a thirty-day extension (Dkt. 963). The Government's motion is granted. The Government shall file its response no later than April 10, 2019. Walker filed a request that this Court stay his case because he is in transit to another facility (Dkt. 964). Given that the Government will not be filing its response until April, the Court sees no reason to delay the proceedings in this case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
