GRADY v. STATE, 1:15CV172-SA-DAS. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20170310c75
Visitors: 24
Filed: Mar. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION [24] TO EXPAND THE RECORD SHARION AYCOCK , District Judge . This matter comes before the court on the request by the pro se petitioner to expand the record in this case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254. In a 2254 proceeding, a judge has the discretion to require the parties to expand the record as necessary and, if good cause is shown, authorize limited discovery. Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings, Rules 6-7. As this case has been dismissed for failure to exhau
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION [24] TO EXPAND THE RECORD SHARION AYCOCK , District Judge . This matter comes before the court on the request by the pro se petitioner to expand the record in this case filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254. In a 2254 proceeding, a judge has the discretion to require the parties to expand the record as necessary and, if good cause is shown, authorize limited discovery. Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings, Rules 6-7. As this case has been dismissed for failure to exhaus..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION [24] TO EXPAND THE RECORD
SHARION AYCOCK, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on the request by the pro se petitioner to expand the record in this case filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In a § 2254 proceeding, a judge has the discretion to require the parties to expand the record as necessary and, if good cause is shown, authorize limited discovery. Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings, Rules 6-7. As this case has been dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies, expanding the record could not affect the resolution of this case, As such, the instant motion [24] is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
