McDERMOTT v. ASTRUE, 11-CV-2409 (PJS/AJB). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20120806633
Visitors: 122
Filed: Aug. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Maureen McDermott's objection to the June 13, 2012 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan. Judge Boylan recommends granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment and denying McDermott's motion for summary judgment. The Court has conducted a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Based on that review
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Maureen McDermott's objection to the June 13, 2012 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan. Judge Boylan recommends granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment and denying McDermott's motion for summary judgment. The Court has conducted a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Based on that review,..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Maureen McDermott's objection to the June 13, 2012 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan. Judge Boylan recommends granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment and denying McDermott's motion for summary judgment. The Court has conducted a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts Judge Boylan's thorough and careful R&R.
ORDER
Based on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court ADOPTS the R&R [Docket No. 18]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 10] is DENIED.
2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 15] is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's complaint [Docket No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND ON THE MERITS.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
