Lewis v. Colvin, 3:14-cv-812-DPJ-FKB. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20160308b35
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 07, 2016
Summary: ORDER DANIEL P. JORDAN, III , District Judge . This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court. Magistrate Judge Ball recommended affirming the decision of the Social Security Administration. Plaintiff Bobby Michael Lewis did not file an Objection, and the time to do so has passed. The Court, having fully reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Summary: ORDER DANIEL P. JORDAN, III , District Judge . This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court. Magistrate Judge Ball recommended affirming the decision of the Social Security Administration. Plaintiff Bobby Michael Lewis did not file an Objection, and the time to do so has passed. The Court, having fully reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate J..
More
ORDER
DANIEL P. JORDAN, III, District Judge.
This cause came on this date to be heard upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, after referral of hearing by this Court. Magistrate Judge Ball recommended affirming the decision of the Social Security Administration. Plaintiff Bobby Michael Lewis did not file an Objection, and the time to do so has passed. The Court, having fully reviewed the unopposed Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge entered in this cause, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Report and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge F. Keith Ball be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the finding of this Court. The decision of the Social Security Administration is affirmed, and this appeal is dismissed with prejudice.
A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with the Order as required by Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.
Source: Leagle
