DePUE v. UAW-GM LEGAL SERVICES, 13-CV-14369-DT. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140801h76
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In her July 10, 2014 report, the magistrate judge recommends that this court grant Defendants' "Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment", (Doc #10). No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived. 1 Having r
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In her July 10, 2014 report, the magistrate judge recommends that this court grant Defendants' "Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment", (Doc #10). No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived. 1 Having re..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In her July 10, 2014 report, the magistrate judge recommends that this court grant Defendants' "Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment", (Doc #10).
No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1 Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this Order.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Defendant's "Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment (Doc #10) is GRANTED.
FootNotes
1. The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Any objection was due with the ten days of service, Fed.R.Civ.P.6(e). No objection has been filed as of the date of this order.
Source: Leagle
