Hopkins v. Saul, 3:19-CV-00214-JMV. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20200205f03
Visitors: 24
Filed: Feb. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2020
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . Consistent with the Order [19] granting Defendant's motion for remand of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this case is REVERSED and REMANDED for further action by the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand the Commissioner shall instruct the ALJ to specifically address the opinion evidence and give further consideration to plaintiff's residual functional capacity and issue
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . Consistent with the Order [19] granting Defendant's motion for remand of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this case is REVERSED and REMANDED for further action by the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). On remand the Commissioner shall instruct the ALJ to specifically address the opinion evidence and give further consideration to plaintiff's residual functional capacity and issue ..
More
FINAL JUDGMENT
JANE M. VIRDEN, Magistrate Judge.
Consistent with the Order [19] granting Defendant's motion for remand of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this case is REVERSED and REMANDED for further action by the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand the Commissioner shall instruct the ALJ to specifically address the opinion evidence and give further consideration to plaintiff's residual functional capacity and issue a new decision.
Source: Leagle
