BRACEY v. YOKOHAMA TIRE CORPORATION, 3:09CV627-CWR-FKB. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20120529777
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 01, 2012
Latest Update: May 01, 2012
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION F. KEITH BALL, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Petition for Approval of Third Party Settlement (Docket No. 127), which has been referred to the undersigned for consideration. See Docket No. 128. The undersigned has held a hearing attended by counsel, has considered the Petition and the evidence submitted in support of the Petition, and finds that the Petition should be granted. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that the Petition be grant
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION F. KEITH BALL, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Petition for Approval of Third Party Settlement (Docket No. 127), which has been referred to the undersigned for consideration. See Docket No. 128. The undersigned has held a hearing attended by counsel, has considered the Petition and the evidence submitted in support of the Petition, and finds that the Petition should be granted. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that the Petition be grante..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
F. KEITH BALL, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Petition for Approval of Third Party Settlement (Docket No. 127), which has been referred to the undersigned for consideration. See Docket No. 128. The undersigned has held a hearing attended by counsel, has considered the Petition and the evidence submitted in support of the Petition, and finds that the Petition should be granted. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that the Petition be granted and that the District Judge enter an order approving the proposed settlement.
The parties are hereby notified that failure to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation contained within this report and recommendation within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy shall bar that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court. 28 U.S.C. § 636, Douglass v. United Services Automobile Association, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996).
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.
Source: Leagle
