Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Smith v. Corizon Health Corporation, 18-CV-10010-DT. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20180410958 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT H. CLELAND , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his report filed on March 13, 2018, the magistrate judge recommended that this court deny as moot Defendant Corizon Health Inc's, [Doc #12] Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6). No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), thus furt
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his report filed on March 13, 2018, the magistrate judge recommended that this court deny as moot Defendant Corizon Health Inc's, [Doc #12] Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6). No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1

Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this Order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Defendant Corizon Health Inc's, Motion to Dismiss [Dkt #12] is DENIED AS MOOT WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

FootNotes


1. The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer