Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Malouf v. Mike Stockton Baymont Wholesale, Inc., 4:18-cv-213-DMB-JMV. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Mississippi Number: infdco20190416927 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS JANE M. VIRDEN , Magistrate Judge . Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, "[a] motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand . . . and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the motion . . ." L.U. Civ. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). A motion to remand [23] has been filed. Therefore, staying certain proceedings is appro
More

ORDER STAYING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS

Local Uniform Civil Rule 16(b)(1)(B) provides, "[a] motion to remand . . . will stay the attorney conference and disclosure requirements and all discovery not relevant to the remand . . . and will stay the parties' obligation to make disclosures pending the court's ruling on the motion . . ." L.U. Civ. R. 16(b)(1)(B) (emphasis added). A motion to remand [23] has been filed. Therefore, staying certain proceedings is appropriate.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the aforementioned proceedings are hereby STAYED pending a ruling on the motion to remand. The parties must promptly notify the magistrate judge of any order denying the motion to remand and must promptly submit a proposed order lifting the stay.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer