Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BROYLES v. CANTOR FITZGERALD & CO., 3:10-857 JJB-CBW. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Louisiana Number: infdco20170627b36 Visitors: 2
Filed: May 30, 2017
Latest Update: May 30, 2017
Summary: FIRST REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER C. MICHAEL HILL , Special Master . After reviewing the pleadings in this case and various rulings made by the Court, the undersigned has concluded that the "Motion in limine to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Edwin Witham" (Docket No. 10-854, Rec. Doc. 591) is moot , and can be dismissed as such. The undersigned notified the parties by Minute Entry of May 21, 2017 [Rec. Doc. 129] that unless some objection was filed by May 26, 2017 that I intended to recom
More

FIRST REPORT OF SPECIAL MASTER

After reviewing the pleadings in this case and various rulings made by the Court, the undersigned has concluded that the "Motion in limine to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Edwin Witham" (Docket No. 10-854, Rec. Doc. 591) is moot, and can be dismissed as such. The undersigned notified the parties by Minute Entry of May 21, 2017 [Rec. Doc. 129] that unless some objection was filed by May 26, 2017 that I intended to recommend to the Court that this motion be dismissed as moot. No objection has been filed.

It further appears to me that the "Motion to Strike Expert Reports and Testimony" (Docket No. 10-854, Rec. Doc. 5861) has been decided by the Court as to Mr. Monteleone, but not as to Messers Urban and Favret. The parties were also notified as to my conclusion regarding this motion. Again, no objection to my conclusion has been filed.

Accordingly;

IT IS RECOMMENDED that the "Motion in limine to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Edwin Witham" (Docket No. 10-854, Rec. Doc. 591) be dismissed as moot;

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the that the "Motion to Strike Expert Reports and Testimony" (Docket No. 10-854, Rec. Doc. 586) be terminated as to Mr. Monteleone only.

Any party wishing to object to this Recommendation shall file its objections no later than 21 days from service of this Recommendation.

FootNotes


1. In my Minute Entry I transposed the Document Number. The correct Document Number is set out herein.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer