GRONSKI v. CLIFTON, 13-13928. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140801h97
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOHN CORBETT O'MEARA, District Judge. Before the court is a report and recommendation filed June 12, 2014 by Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris. Plaintiff filed objections to the report and recommendation on June 30, 2014. This court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). The court "may accept, reject or modify, in wh
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOHN CORBETT O'MEARA, District Judge. Before the court is a report and recommendation filed June 12, 2014 by Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris. Plaintiff filed objections to the report and recommendation on June 30, 2014. This court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). The court "may accept, reject or modify, in who..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JOHN CORBETT O'MEARA, District Judge.
Before the court is a report and recommendation filed June 12, 2014 by Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris. Plaintiff filed objections to the report and recommendation on June 30, 2014.
This court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court "may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." Id.
Having thoroughly reviewed the entire record, the court finds that Magistrate Judge Morris reached the correct conclusions. Accordingly, the court will overrule Plaintiff's objections.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the court's findings and conclusions.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Clifton and Bull-Ehinger's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
