HAMMOND v. CITY OF TROY, 15-12051. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20151009993
Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Ledell Hammond's Motion for Scheduling Order for Discovery [Doc. #20]. Defendants Troy Police Department and 52-4 District Court have each filed motions to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff's responses to these motions are due on October 22, 2015. It would be prudent to stay discovery pending resolution of these dispositive motions. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for scheduling order [Doc. #20] is DENIED
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Ledell Hammond's Motion for Scheduling Order for Discovery [Doc. #20]. Defendants Troy Police Department and 52-4 District Court have each filed motions to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff's responses to these motions are due on October 22, 2015. It would be prudent to stay discovery pending resolution of these dispositive motions. Therefore, Plaintiff's motion for scheduling order [Doc. #20] is DENIED ..
More
ORDER
R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Ledell Hammond's Motion for Scheduling Order for Discovery [Doc. #20].
Defendants Troy Police Department and 52-4 District Court have each filed motions to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff's responses to these motions are due on October 22, 2015. It would be prudent to stay discovery pending resolution of these dispositive motions. Therefore,
Plaintiff's motion for scheduling order [Doc. #20] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Discovery is STAYED pending final decision on the Defendants' motions to dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
