Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Aldridge v. Berryhill, 5:17-CV-00424-FL. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20180504g63 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 03, 2018
Latest Update: May 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER LOUISE W. FLANAGAN , District Judge . Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and upon consideration of Defendant's unopposed request to remand this cause for further administrative action, the Court hereby reverses Defendant's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and re
More

ORDER

Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and upon consideration of Defendant's unopposed request to remand this cause for further administrative action, the Court hereby reverses Defendant's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and remands the case to Defendant for further administrative action. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). Upon remand, Defendant will reconsider the opinions of Drs. Friedman and Nguyen in determining whether Plaintiff was disabled based on all limitations, including limitations due to drug addiction or alcoholism.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer