Filed: Dec. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO DEPOSITION TESTIMONY LOUIS GUIROLA, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Having reviewed the objections of the parties to the deposition testimony sought to be offered at the trial of this action and submitted to this Court, as well as any responses thereto, the Court finds as follows: There are no objections to the deposition testimony of Dr. Eric Wolfson. The Court addresses the parties' specific objections to the deposition testimony of Dr. Arthur D. Black below.
Summary: ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO DEPOSITION TESTIMONY LOUIS GUIROLA, Jr. , Chief District Judge . Having reviewed the objections of the parties to the deposition testimony sought to be offered at the trial of this action and submitted to this Court, as well as any responses thereto, the Court finds as follows: There are no objections to the deposition testimony of Dr. Eric Wolfson. The Court addresses the parties' specific objections to the deposition testimony of Dr. Arthur D. Black below. ..
More
ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO DEPOSITION TESTIMONY
LOUIS GUIROLA, Jr., Chief District Judge.
Having reviewed the objections of the parties to the deposition testimony sought to be offered at the trial of this action and submitted to this Court, as well as any responses thereto, the Court finds as follows:
There are no objections to the deposition testimony of Dr. Eric Wolfson. The Court addresses the parties' specific objections to the deposition testimony of Dr. Arthur D. Black below.
DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO THE DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF DR. ARTHUR D. BLACK:
Page 83, Lines 19-25: Defendant objects to this testimony, claiming that the question is leading. Plaintiff concedes this objection, and therefore, it is SUSTAINED.
Page 84, Lines 1-14: Defendant objects to this testimony, because it claims that the question is leading. Plaintiff responds that she is not offering the subject testimony. Therefore, the objection is MOOT.
Page 84, Lines 22-23: Defendant objects to this testimony, because it argues that the question is leading. Plaintiff disputes Defendant's classification of the question. The Court finds that the question is not leading, and therefore, the objection is OVERRULED.
SO ORDERED AND ASJUDGED.
