Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Louk, 14-20733. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20171012f46 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2017
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PETITION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF LINDA V. PARKER , District Judge . In 2015, Defendant Tosh Romon Louk ("Louk") pleaded guilty to felon in possession of a firearm and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of sixty months. While incarcerated at a Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") facility in Terre Haute, Indiana, Louk filed a petition for injunctive relief in the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. Compl., Louk v. Krueger, No. 2:17-cv-00357 (S.D.
More

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PETITION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

In 2015, Defendant Tosh Romon Louk ("Louk") pleaded guilty to felon in possession of a firearm and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of sixty months. While incarcerated at a Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") facility in Terre Haute, Indiana, Louk filed a petition for injunctive relief in the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. Compl., Louk v. Krueger, No. 2:17-cv-00357 (S.D. Ind. July 28, 2017), ECF No. 1. Specifically, Louk challenged BOP's refusal to grant him a reduction in his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e)(2),1 claiming the decision violated the Administrative Procedures Act ("APA"). Id. A copy of the petition also was filed in the above-captioned case. (ECF No. 30.)

On August 2, 2017, the Honorable William T. Lawrence of the District Court for the Southern District of Indiana entered an order dismissing Louk's action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). Entry Discussing Filing Fee, Dismissing Complaint, and Directing Further Proceedings, Louk, No. 2:17-cv-00357 (S.D. Ind. Aug. 2, 2017), ECF No. 3. Judge Lawrence concluded that Louk's complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted because "the Seventh Circuit held in Lopez v. Rios, 553 F. App'x 610 (2014), that 18 U.S.C. § 3625 categorically bars any APA action challenging a BOP discretionary denial of early release following completion of a drug treatment program." Id. at Pg ID 13 (citing Lopez, 553 F. App'x at 610). Judge Lawrence also relied on Supreme Court precedent holding that BOP's regulation excluding prisoners with firearms involvement from early release is a reasonable and permissible administrative policy. Id. (citing Lopez v. Davis, 531 U.S.C. § 230, 244 (2001)).

Louk is bound by Judge Lawrence's ruling. As such, this Court DENIES WITH PREJUDICE his petition in the above-captioned case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e)(2) empowers the BOP to reduce by up to one year the sentence of a prisoner convicted of a nonviolent offense upon completion of a drug treatment program.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer