Cooley v. Hibu Inc., 19-cv-00269-MMD-VCF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190321e38
Visitors: 18
Filed: Mar. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2019
Summary: DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Hibu Inc. ("Hibu") respectfully files this motion for leave for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff Blake Cooley's ("Plaintiff") class action complaint. Dkt. No. 1. The deadline for Hibu to respond to Plaintiff's class action complaint is March 20, 2019. Due to the nature of the allegations in this Telephone
Summary: DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Hibu Inc. ("Hibu") respectfully files this motion for leave for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff Blake Cooley's ("Plaintiff") class action complaint. Dkt. No. 1. The deadline for Hibu to respond to Plaintiff's class action complaint is March 20, 2019. Due to the nature of the allegations in this Telephone C..
More
DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Hibu Inc. ("Hibu") respectfully files this motion for leave for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff Blake Cooley's ("Plaintiff") class action complaint. Dkt. No. 1.
The deadline for Hibu to respond to Plaintiff's class action complaint is March 20, 2019. Due to the nature of the allegations in this Telephone Consumer Protection Act class action, Hibu requests the Court extend the time to file its response by 21 days to April 10, 2019.
Plaintiff's counsel consented to the filing of this motion on March 18, 2019 via email.
If granted, the new deadline for Hibu to file its response to Plaintiff's class action complaint would be no later than Wednesday, April 10, 2019. This request is made in good faith and for no improper purpose and does not prejudice either party.
WHEREFORE, Hibu respectfully requests the Court grant this motion for leave for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's class action complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
