DOE v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS, 4:10-CV-2158-JAR. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20120312729
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Amended List of Witnesses [ECF No. 158] filed March 2, 2012. Defendants filed their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion on March 2, 2012 [ECF No. 159]. Plaintiff filed his Reply to Defendants' Opposition on March 7, 2012 [ECF No. 164]. After consideration, the Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion because the proposed amendment is untimely, and because this matter i
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Amended List of Witnesses [ECF No. 158] filed March 2, 2012. Defendants filed their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion on March 2, 2012 [ECF No. 159]. Plaintiff filed his Reply to Defendants' Opposition on March 7, 2012 [ECF No. 164]. After consideration, the Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion because the proposed amendment is untimely, and because this matter is..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Amended List of Witnesses [ECF No. 158] filed March 2, 2012. Defendants filed their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion on March 2, 2012 [ECF No. 159]. Plaintiff filed his Reply to Defendants' Opposition on March 7, 2012 [ECF No. 164]. After consideration, the Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion because the proposed amendment is untimely, and because this matter is currently set for jury trial on April 23, 2012.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff's Amended List of Witnesses [ECF No. 158] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
