Pouncy v. Palmer, 13-cv-14695. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20171215b60
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S RULE 60(b)/RULE 54(b) MOTION MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy, through counsel, has filed a motion under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b) and 54(b) (docket no. 150). Respondent Carmen D. Palmer, through counsel, has filed an answer in opposition (docket no. 151). Petitioner has filed a reply (docket no. 152). This Court, having considered the pleadings, the applicable law, and the record of this case: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED
Summary: ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S RULE 60(b)/RULE 54(b) MOTION MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy, through counsel, has filed a motion under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b) and 54(b) (docket no. 150). Respondent Carmen D. Palmer, through counsel, has filed an answer in opposition (docket no. 151). Petitioner has filed a reply (docket no. 152). This Court, having considered the pleadings, the applicable law, and the record of this case: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ..
More
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S RULE 60(b)/RULE 54(b) MOTION
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.
Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy, through counsel, has filed a motion under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b) and 54(b) (docket no. 150). Respondent Carmen D. Palmer, through counsel, has filed an answer in opposition (docket no. 151). Petitioner has filed a reply (docket no. 152). This Court, having considered the pleadings, the applicable law, and the record of this case:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's motion is DENIED for the reasons stated on the record during the telephonic status conference held in this matter on Thursday, December 7, 2017.
Source: Leagle
