Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SMITH v. LUDWICK, 10-11052. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20130821c60 Visitors: 22
Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND HOLDING PETITION IN ABEYANCE JOHN CORBETT O'MEARA, District Judge. Before the court is Magistrate Judge Paul Komives's report and recommendation, filed March 14, 2013. This court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C). The court "may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND HOLDING PETITION IN ABEYANCE

JOHN CORBETT O'MEARA, District Judge.

Before the court is Magistrate Judge Paul Komives's report and recommendation, filed March 14, 2013. This court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court "may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." Id.

The parties have not filed objections to the report and recommendation. The court agrees with the magistrate judge's conclusion that this matter should be stayed to allow Petitioner to exhaust his state court remedies. The stay is conditioned on Petitioner filing a motion for relief from judgment in state court within 30 days of the date of this order. To re-open this matter, Petitioner shall file a motion to lift the stay within 30 days of exhausting the state court appeals process.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Komives's March 14, 2013 report and recommendation is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is STAYED and Petitioner's petition is HELD IN ABEYANCE, consistent with the conditions set forth in this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for bond and Respondent's motion to dismiss are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining pending motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and may be re-filed when the stay is lifted.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer