Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Stackpole Int'l Engineering, Ltd. v. Angstrom Automotive Group LLC, 17-13748. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20180423850 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER LIFTING SUSPENSION OF BRIEFING AND SETTING SCHEDULE ROBERT H. CLELAND , District Judge . In this contract dispute regarding the supply of automotive parts Plaintiff alleges claims for breach of contract, breach of warranty, and claim and delivery (Dkt. # 1). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 11). Plaintiff filed a response (Dkt. # 13) and also a motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. # 14). Upon reviewing the motions, the court was inclined to conclude that many, if not
More

ORDER LIFTING SUSPENSION OF BRIEFING AND SETTING SCHEDULE

In this contract dispute regarding the supply of automotive parts Plaintiff alleges claims for breach of contract, breach of warranty, and claim and delivery (Dkt. # 1). Defendants filed a motion to dismiss (Dkt. # 11). Plaintiff filed a response (Dkt. # 13) and also a motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. # 14). Upon reviewing the motions, the court was inclined to conclude that many, if not all, of the material facts were undisputed.

During a status conference held on February 1, 2018, the parties agreed to meet and confer for the purpose of developing a stipulated record of material facts with the intention of filing cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings. During the course of their extensive good-faith negotiations, it became apparent that there exist material facts to which the parties do not agree or do not agree as to their materiality. Therefore, the court will lift the suspension on the parties' briefing and resume briefing on the pending motions based on a schedule stipulated to by the parties. Unless otherwise ordered, the court will not conduct a hearing on the motions. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall file their reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss by April 30, 2018 and shall file their response to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by May 21, 2018.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file its reply in support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by June 4, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer