Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ziemann v. Colvin, 4:16 CV 1198 RWS. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri Number: infdco20171116d36 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2017
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RODNEY W. SIPPEL , District Judge . This matter is before me on a Report and Recommendation to affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny Plaintiff benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Neither of the parties has filed an objection to this recommendation. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge David D. Noce for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). Judge Noce issued a Report and Recommenda
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before me on a Report and Recommendation to affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny Plaintiff benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Neither of the parties has filed an objection to this recommendation.

This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge David D. Noce for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Judge Noce issued a Report and Recommendation on October 23, 2017 that recommended that the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits should be affirmed. Judge Noce found that the Administrative Law Judge's determination that Plaintiff was not entitled to benefits was supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Any objections to Judge Noce's Report and Recommendation had to be filed by November 6, 2017. Neither of the parties has filed an objection as of today's date.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Noce is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED herein. The Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny Supplemental Security Income benefits to Plaintiff is affirmed.

FootNotes


1. The Hon. Nancy A. Berryhill is now the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, she is substituted in her official capacity for Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this action.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer