Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Comeger v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 1:16CV13-LG-RHW. (2016)

Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi Number: infdco20160525d42 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 24, 2016
Latest Update: May 24, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS LOUIS GUIROLA, Jr. , Chief District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is the Motion to Dismiss [15] filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Pro se plaintiffs Dwayne and Joyce Comeger allege that the defendants wrongfully foreclosed on property they owned in Carriere, Mississippi, despite notice that the property was protected by a bankruptcy stay. In this Motion, Wells Fargo contends that the bankruptcy case was filed by the Nanotek Group
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

BEFORE THE COURT is the Motion to Dismiss [15] filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Pro se plaintiffs Dwayne and Joyce Comeger allege that the defendants wrongfully foreclosed on property they owned in Carriere, Mississippi, despite notice that the property was protected by a bankruptcy stay. In this Motion, Wells Fargo contends that the bankruptcy case was filed by the Nanotek Group Irrevocable Trust, an entity that did not own the property, and therefore foreclosure of the Carriere property was not prevented by the bankruptcy stay. The plaintiffs have not responded and the deadline for doing so has passed.

The Court recently considered and granted a motion to dismiss filed by defendants Morris & Associates and Emily Kaye Courteau based on identical arguments. (See Mem. Op. & Order Granting Mot. to Dismiss, Apr. 19, 2016, ECF No. 13). Because the current Motion does not require the Court to consider different facts, legal arguments, or supporting documentation, the findings and conclusions of the earlier order will be incorporated herein by reference. For the reasons stated in the earlier order, the plaintiffs fail to allege facts showing a plausible claim of violation of the bankruptcy stay or wrongful foreclosure against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Dismiss [15] filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims against this defendant are DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer