Muller v. Mississippi Power Company, 1:17-cv-00339-LG-RHW. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Number: infdco20190128837
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2019
Summary: AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the agreement of Plaintiff Mark Muller and Defendants Mississippi Power Company, Hardy Wheeless, and Charles E. Smith, through their undersigned counsel, that Plaintiff's Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress claim should be dismissed against Defendants Hardy Wheeless and Charles E. Smith in this action with prejudice. The Court having been advised of such agreement finds that Plain
Summary: AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the agreement of Plaintiff Mark Muller and Defendants Mississippi Power Company, Hardy Wheeless, and Charles E. Smith, through their undersigned counsel, that Plaintiff's Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress claim should be dismissed against Defendants Hardy Wheeless and Charles E. Smith in this action with prejudice. The Court having been advised of such agreement finds that Plaint..
More
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
LOUIS GUIROLA, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the agreement of Plaintiff Mark Muller and Defendants Mississippi Power Company, Hardy Wheeless, and Charles E. Smith, through their undersigned counsel, that Plaintiff's Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress claim should be dismissed against Defendants Hardy Wheeless and Charles E. Smith in this action with prejudice. The Court having been advised of such agreement finds that Plaintiff's Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress claim should be dismissed against Defendants Hardy Wheeless and Charles E. Smith, and that Defendants Hardy Wheeless and Charles E. Smith should thereby be dismissed from the action entirely.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, adjudged and decreed that Plaintiff's Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress claim is dismissed against Defendants Hardy Wheeless and Charles E. Smith with prejudice, and Defendants Hardy Wheeless and Charles E. Smith are dismissed from the action entirely.
SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.
Source: Leagle
