Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TOUSSAINT v. FORREST COUNTY, 2:17-CV-43-KS-MTP. (2017)

Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi Number: infdco20170627c01
Filed: Jun. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2017
Summary: ORDER KEITH STARRETT , District Judge . On June 20, 2017, Plaintiff ("Movant") filed his Motion to Amend [17]. Defendants ("Respondents") have until on or before July 5, 2017, to respond to these motions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movants wises to file a rebuttal, they may do so on or before July 12, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If either Movant or Respondents require an extension of time, they must file a motion for such prior to the de
More

ORDER

On June 20, 2017, Plaintiff ("Movant") filed his Motion to Amend [17]. Defendants ("Respondents") have until on or before July 5, 2017, to respond to these motions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). If Movants wises to file a rebuttal, they may do so on or before July 12, 2017. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d); L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4).

If either Movant or Respondents require an extension of time, they must file a motion for such prior to the deadline's expiration. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(4). Any party seeking an extension must advise the Court whether it is opposed. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(10).

Movant's original and reply memoranda shall not exceed a combined total of thirty-five (35) pages, and Respondents' response shall not exceed thirty-five (35) pages. L.U.Civ.R. 7(b)(5). If a party requires more pages to fully respond, they may seek leave to do file an excess of pages.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer