GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.
Hamza Gibson, ("Petitioner"), presently confined at the Chippewa Correctional Facility in Kincheloe, Michigan, filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent was ordered to file an answer. On March 23, 2015, respondent filed an answer to the petition and sent a copy to petitioner.
Petitioner has sent a letter to this Court, indicating that the copy of the answer that he received from respondent contained only the odd numbered pages. Petitioner has also provided the Court with a copy of the answer that he claims he received from respondent, which only includes odd numbered pages. Petitioner asks this Court to order respondent to provide a complete copy of the answer to petitioner. Petitioner also asks for an extension of time to file a reply to the respondent's answer once he receives a complete copy.
A state is procedurally required under the general rules of Federal Civil Procedure to serve a habeas petitioner with its answer to a petition for habeas corpus. See Rodriguez v. Florida Dep't of Corr., 748 F.3d 1073, 1076 (11th Cir. —); cert. denied, 135 S.Ct. 1170 (2015). Because the answer received by petitioner was purportedly incomplete, the Court orders respondent to provide a complete copy of the answer to petitioner within twenty one days of the Court's order.
The Court will give petitioner sixty days from the date that he receives a complete copy of the answer to file a reply brief. Rule 5(e) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254 states that a habeas petitioner "may submit a reply to the respondent's answer or other pleading within a time fixed by the judge." See Baysdell v. Howes, 2005 WL 1838443, * 4 (E.D. Mich. August 1, 2005).