R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
On September 8, 2017, Defendant filed a motion to compel discovery [Doc. #9], stating that Plaintiff has not responded to interrogatories and document requests, and has not provided a date for her deposition.
Plaintiff has not responded to Defendant's motion, although the time for doing so has passed. In addition, because more than 30 days have passed since Defendant served its discovery requests on April 27, 2017, Plaintiff has waived any objections. See Jagielo v. Van Dyke Public Schools, 2010 WL 259053, *2 (E.D. Mich. 2010); Fed.R.Civ.P. 34(b). Therefore, this motion is deemed unopposed.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion to compel [Doc. #9] is GRANTED.
No later than 21 days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff will serve responses to Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents, and sign and return to Defendant's counsel the requested authorizations for release of medical records. Plaintiff will also provide a firm date for her deposition, and that deposition will be conducted no later than 30 days from the date of this Order.
Discovery is extended 30 days from the date of this Order, solely for the purpose of compliance with this Order.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a)(5), Plaintiff will pay Defendant's attorney in the amount of $500.00.
Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Order or with other discovery orders or proper discovery requests may result in additional sanctions, including dismissal of the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.