Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Housey v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, 16-14302. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20171004j42 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . On September 8, 2017, Defendant filed a motion to compel discovery [Doc. #9], stating that Plaintiff has not responded to interrogatories and document requests, and has not provided a date for her deposition. Plaintiff has not responded to Defendant's motion, although the time for doing so has passed. In addition, because more than 30 days have passed since Defendant served its discovery requests on April 27, 2017, Plaintiff has waived any object
More

ORDER

On September 8, 2017, Defendant filed a motion to compel discovery [Doc. #9], stating that Plaintiff has not responded to interrogatories and document requests, and has not provided a date for her deposition.

Plaintiff has not responded to Defendant's motion, although the time for doing so has passed. In addition, because more than 30 days have passed since Defendant served its discovery requests on April 27, 2017, Plaintiff has waived any objections. See Jagielo v. Van Dyke Public Schools, 2010 WL 259053, *2 (E.D. Mich. 2010); Fed.R.Civ.P. 34(b). Therefore, this motion is deemed unopposed.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion to compel [Doc. #9] is GRANTED.1

No later than 21 days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff will serve responses to Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents, and sign and return to Defendant's counsel the requested authorizations for release of medical records. Plaintiff will also provide a firm date for her deposition, and that deposition will be conducted no later than 30 days from the date of this Order.

Discovery is extended 30 days from the date of this Order, solely for the purpose of compliance with this Order.

Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a)(5), Plaintiff will pay Defendant's attorney in the amount of $500.00.2

Plaintiff's failure to comply with this Order or with other discovery orders or proper discovery requests may result in additional sanctions, including dismissal of the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Defendant also requests that Plaintiff submit to an independent medical examination ("IME") under Fed.R.Civ.P. 35. That request is not properly before the Court in the context of the present motion.
2. Rule 37(a)(5) provides that where a party fails to answer discovery requests, and a motion to compel is granted, "the court must, after giving an opportunity to be heard, require the party . . . to pay the movant's reasonable attorney's fees." Plaintiff had the opportunity to be heard by filing a response to the Defendant's motion (which included a request for attorney fees), but did not do so.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer