U.S. v. Hartzog, 2:19-CR-03. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190626b75
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IN PART ROBERT J. JONKER , Chief District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objection has been made thereto within the time required by law. Based on this, and on the Court's review of all matters of record, including the transcript of the plea proceedings, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report an
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IN PART ROBERT J. JONKER , Chief District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objection has been made thereto within the time required by law. Based on this, and on the Court's review of all matters of record, including the transcript of the plea proceedings, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IN PART
ROBERT J. JONKER, Chief District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objection has been made thereto within the time required by law. Based on this, and on the Court's review of all matters of record, including the transcript of the plea proceedings, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 50) is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court, except with respect to continuation of bond pending sentencing. The Court would normally treat a conviction like this as a mandatory remand offense under 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2). Either party may file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, July 8, 2019, explaining why an exception applies under that section; or why "exceptional reasons" exist under 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c); or why there is any other basis to avoid application of mandatory remand in this case.
2. Defendant's plea of guilty is accepted and defendant is adjudicated guilty of the charge set forth in Count 1 of the Indictment.
3. The written plea agreement is hereby continued under advisement pending sentencing.
Source: Leagle
