Filed: Mar. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 4(m) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE DEFENDANT'S, RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Counsel for plaintiff has failed to show good cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve Defendants Hammel, Monique Hubbard-Pickett, Hinckle, Rodriguez, Hosely, Robins, according to the requirements of Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this a
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 4(m) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE DEFENDANT'S, RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Counsel for plaintiff has failed to show good cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve Defendants Hammel, Monique Hubbard-Pickett, Hinckle, Rodriguez, Hosely, Robins, according to the requirements of Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that this ac..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 4(m) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE DEFENDANT'S,
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Counsel for plaintiff has failed to show good cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve Defendants Hammel, Monique Hubbard-Pickett, Hinckle, Rodriguez, Hosely, Robins, according to the requirements of Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant Hammel, Monique Hubbard-Pickett, Hinckle, Rodriguez, Hosely, Robins.
