Filed: Oct. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER STEWART DALZELL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 16 th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of the defendant's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion to strike, and to stay proceedings (docket entry #13), plaintiffs' response in opposition thereto, and our Memorandum issued this day on this case, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's motion to strike (docket entry #13) is GRANTED; 2. All portions of the complaint referring to Pennsylvania's Unfair Trade Practices
Summary: ORDER STEWART DALZELL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 16 th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of the defendant's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion to strike, and to stay proceedings (docket entry #13), plaintiffs' response in opposition thereto, and our Memorandum issued this day on this case, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's motion to strike (docket entry #13) is GRANTED; 2. All portions of the complaint referring to Pennsylvania's Unfair Trade Practices a..
More
ORDER
STEWART DALZELL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of the defendant's motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion to strike, and to stay proceedings (docket entry #13), plaintiffs' response in opposition thereto, and our Memorandum issued this day on this case, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's motion to strike (docket entry #13) is GRANTED;
2. All portions of the complaint referring to Pennsylvania's Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, 73 Pa. Cons. Stat. §§ 201 et seq., are STRICKEN;
3. Defendant's motion to stay (docket entry #13) is DENIED; and
4. Defendant shall ANSWER the complaint by noon on October 30, 2015.
