Hines v. Smith, 16-3797(DSD/SER). (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20171128a82
Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2017
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. DOTY , District Judge . This matter is before the court upon the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated November 1, 2017 (R&R). The magistrate judge recommended that the court deny plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction without prejudice. No objections to the R&R have been filed in the time period permitted. Under these circumstances, the court finds it appropriate to adopt the R&R. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R [ECF
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. DOTY , District Judge . This matter is before the court upon the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated November 1, 2017 (R&R). The magistrate judge recommended that the court deny plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction without prejudice. No objections to the R&R have been filed in the time period permitted. Under these circumstances, the court finds it appropriate to adopt the R&R. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The R&R [ECF N..
More
ORDER
DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated November 1, 2017 (R&R). The magistrate judge recommended that the court deny plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction without prejudice. No objections to the R&R have been filed in the time period permitted. Under these circumstances, the court finds it appropriate to adopt the R&R.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The R&R [ECF No. 108] is adopted in its entirety; and
2. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [ECF No. 104] is denied without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
