Rowell v. Lassen, 18-cv-2570 (MJD/TNL). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20181214c99
Visitors: 23
Filed: Dec. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 13, 2018
Summary: CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER TONY N. LEUNG , Magistrate Judge . On May 29, 2018, Jessica Monique Rowell filed a Complaint (ECF No. 1) naming Tara L. Lassen as defendant. Lassen filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint on December 6, 2018 (ECF No. 13). This motion has been referred to the undersigned for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and D. Minn. LR 72.1. Briefing on Defendant's motion to dismiss shall occur as follows: 1. Plaintiff's response is due on or before J
Summary: CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER TONY N. LEUNG , Magistrate Judge . On May 29, 2018, Jessica Monique Rowell filed a Complaint (ECF No. 1) naming Tara L. Lassen as defendant. Lassen filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint on December 6, 2018 (ECF No. 13). This motion has been referred to the undersigned for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636 and D. Minn. LR 72.1. Briefing on Defendant's motion to dismiss shall occur as follows: 1. Plaintiff's response is due on or before Ja..
More
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
TONY N. LEUNG, Magistrate Judge.
On May 29, 2018, Jessica Monique Rowell filed a Complaint (ECF No. 1) naming Tara L. Lassen as defendant. Lassen filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint on December 6, 2018 (ECF No. 13). This motion has been referred to the undersigned for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and D. Minn. LR 72.1. Briefing on Defendant's motion to dismiss shall occur as follows:
1. Plaintiff's response is due on or before January 4, 2019.
2. Defendant's reply is due on or before January 18, 2019.
The motion will then be deemed submitted and the Court will issue its report and recommendation based on the papers, without a hearing.
All prior consistent orders remain in full force and effect. Failure to comply with any provision of this Order or any other prior consistent Order shall subject the non-complying party, non-complying counsel and/or the party such counsel represents to any and all appropriate remedies, sanctions and the like, including without limitation: assessment of costs, fines and attorneys' fees and disbursements; waiver of rights to object; exclusion or limitation of witnesses, testimony, exhibits and other evidence; striking of pleadings; complete or partial dismissal with prejudice; entry of whole or partial default judgment; and/or any other relief that this Court may from time to time deem appropriate.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
