RELMADA THERAPEUTICS, INC. v. LAIDLAW & COMPANY (UK) LTD., 2:15-CV-2338 JCM (CWH). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20151217d67
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is a stipulation to extend the deadline for defendants to file an opposition brief and for plaintiff to file a reply brief. (Doc. #21) The parties proposed deadline injunction hearing on December 22, 2015. This deadline does not afford the court with an appropriate amount of time to consider all the materials. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the stipulation to extend the deadline for defendants
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is a stipulation to extend the deadline for defendants to file an opposition brief and for plaintiff to file a reply brief. (Doc. #21) The parties proposed deadline injunction hearing on December 22, 2015. This deadline does not afford the court with an appropriate amount of time to consider all the materials. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the stipulation to extend the deadline for defendants ..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is a stipulation to extend the deadline for defendants to file an opposition brief and for plaintiff to file a reply brief. (Doc. #21) The parties proposed deadline injunction hearing on December 22, 2015. This deadline does not afford the court with an appropriate amount of time to consider all the materials.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the stipulation to extend the deadline for defendants to file an opposition brief and for plaintiff to file a reply brief (doc. #21) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
Source: Leagle
