REMENTER v. KELLOGG COMPANY, 14-1340. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20151006b62
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 01, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2015
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW , this 1st day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 47], the Plaintiff's response in opposition thereto [ECF No. 51], the Defendants' Reply [ECF No. 49], and the Plaintiff's Sur-Reply [ECF No. 52], IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED ; (2) JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR of Defendants Kellogg Company and Kellogg USA Inc.; and (3) The Clerk of Court is
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW , this 1st day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 47], the Plaintiff's response in opposition thereto [ECF No. 51], the Defendants' Reply [ECF No. 49], and the Plaintiff's Sur-Reply [ECF No. 52], IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED ; (2) JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR of Defendants Kellogg Company and Kellogg USA Inc.; and (3) The Clerk of Court is ..
More
ORDER
WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 47], the Plaintiff's response in opposition thereto [ECF No. 51], the Defendants' Reply [ECF No. 49], and the Plaintiff's Sur-Reply [ECF No. 52], IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED;
(2) JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR of Defendants Kellogg Company and Kellogg USA Inc.; and
(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
Source: Leagle
