SAMUEL T. FREEMAN & CO. v. HIAM, 12-1387. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120613c65
Visitors: 134
Filed: Jun. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. AND NOW, this 11 th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Stay, or Transfer Plaintiff's Interpleader Action (Docket No. 5) and Reply (Docket No. 10), and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 9) and Sur-Reply (Docket No. 14), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Interpleader Action on account of the first-filed rule is DENIED; 2. Defendants' Motion to Transfer
Summary: ORDER RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge. AND NOW, this 11 th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Stay, or Transfer Plaintiff's Interpleader Action (Docket No. 5) and Reply (Docket No. 10), and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 9) and Sur-Reply (Docket No. 14), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Interpleader Action on account of the first-filed rule is DENIED; 2. Defendants' Motion to Transfer ..
More
ORDER
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, Senior District Judge.
AND NOW, this 11th day of June, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Stay, or Transfer Plaintiff's Interpleader Action (Docket No. 5) and Reply (Docket No. 10), and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Docket No. 9) and Sur-Reply (Docket No. 14), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Interpleader Action on account of the first-filed rule is DENIED;
2. Defendants' Motion to Transfer the Interpleader Action to the District of Massachusetts is DENIED;
3. Defendants' Motion to Stay the Interpleader Action pending further clarification from Plaintiff as to service on Wang and Liu is DENIED AS MOOT; and
4. Defendants' request to dismiss the Interpleader Action on the grounds of improper service is DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
