U.S. v. CHAUDHARI, 8:17CR86. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20170511e55
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 10, 2017
Latest Update: May 10, 2017
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO CONTINUE THE DATE FOR FILING MOTIONS [34]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by June 16, 2017. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO CONTINUE THE DATE FOR FILING MOTIONS [34] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 16, 2017. 2. Defendant is o
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO CONTINUE THE DATE FOR FILING MOTIONS [34]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by June 16, 2017. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO CONTINUE THE DATE FOR FILING MOTIONS [34] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 16, 2017. 2. Defendant is or..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's MOTION TO CONTINUE THE DATE FOR FILING MOTIONS [34]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. The defendant will be given an approximate 30-day extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by June 16, 2017.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's MOTION TO CONTINUE THE DATE FOR FILING MOTIONS [34] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 16, 2017.
2. Defendant is ordered to file the affidavit required by Rule 16(c), Fed. R. Cr. P. and NE. Crim. R. 12.1 forthwith.
3. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between today's date and June 16, 2017, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
