Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BAKER v. STEELE, 4:14-CV-333-JAR. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri Number: infdco20150109757 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (Doc. 34). Defendants have responded (Doc. 39). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED. Plaintiff seeks to compel the production of his medical and mental health records as well as various Department of Correction policies, video camera footage, and his individual confinement records during his time in administrative segregation. Defendants respond indicating th
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (Doc. 34). Defendants have responded (Doc. 39). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED.

Plaintiff seeks to compel the production of his medical and mental health records as well as various Department of Correction policies, video camera footage, and his individual confinement records during his time in administrative segregation. Defendants respond indicating that although the medical records are not in their possession and therefore not compellable, they "are in the process of procuring and copying plaintiffs medical records, which they will provide to plaintiff free of charge" (Doc. 39 at 4). The Court therefore directs Defendants to provide them to Plaintiff as indicated. In all other respects, the Defendants have presented sufficient reasons why the materials Plaintiff seeks would threaten the security of the prison and are therefore not discoverable.

Plaintiff has also filed a Motion to Amend/Correct the Case Management Order (Doc. 37). Plaintiff requests the Court extend the deadline for all discovery sixty days from January 1, 2015 to March 1, 2015. In support of his motion Plaintiff directs the Court to the pending Motion to Compel and indicates that he has not received responses to interrogatories and admissions, had not yet been able to obtain his medical records and has not received the DOC policies he requested. As indicated above, the Court will direct Defendants to provide Plaintiff with his medical records as indicated in their brief in opposition. Therefore, an extension of the discovery deadline is warranted. The Court further notes that there is a pending Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 29) which is fully briefed and will be taken up for consideration.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Compel (Doc. 34) is DENIED. Defendants shall provide Plaintiff with his medical records as indicated in their brief in opposition.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERD the Plaintiffs Motion to Amend/Correct the Case Management Order (Doc. 37) is GRANTED. All discovery in this case must be completed by March 1, 2015.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer