U.S. v. BELL, 11-377 (RHK/AJB). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20120327b92
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendant's Objections to the February 6, 2012 Report and Recommendation by United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan, in which Judge Boylan has recommended the denial of Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence as a Result of Search and Seizure be denied. The undersigned has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and Defendant's Objections thereto. Based upon that review and upon all the files, recor
Summary: ORDER RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge. Before the Court are Defendant's Objections to the February 6, 2012 Report and Recommendation by United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan, in which Judge Boylan has recommended the denial of Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence as a Result of Search and Seizure be denied. The undersigned has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and Defendant's Objections thereto. Based upon that review and upon all the files, record..
More
ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
Before the Court are Defendant's Objections to the February 6, 2012 Report and Recommendation by United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan, in which Judge Boylan has recommended the denial of Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence as a Result of Search and Seizure be denied.
The undersigned has conducted a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and Defendant's Objections thereto. Based upon that review and upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Objections (Doc. No. 40) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 33) is ADOPTED;
3. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
