Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hale, 19-03063-01-CR-S-MDH. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. Missouri Number: infdco20190830b55 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY DAVID P. RUSH , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P., 22(k)(26), WDMO, and 28 U.S.C. 636, and has entered a plea of guilty to the Superseding Information filed on August 14, 2019. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary, and that the offense
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P., 22(k)(26), WDMO, and 28 U.S.C. § 636, and has entered a plea of guilty to the Superseding Information filed on August 14, 2019. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by a factual basis for each of the essential elements of the offense. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudged guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

NOTICE

Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within 14 days from the date of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer