BELGHITI v. SELECT RESTAURANTS, INC., 10-12049-GAO. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20120419974
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 18, 2012
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE A. O'TOOLE, Jr., District Judge. Plaintiff has moved to compel further production of documents and further answers to interrogatories pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff argues the defendant's production is incomplete. After careful review, the Motions to Compel (dkt. nos. 14 and 15) are DENIED. To the extent they seek information beyond the substantial document production and written answer to interrogatories, plaintiff's discov
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER GEORGE A. O'TOOLE, Jr., District Judge. Plaintiff has moved to compel further production of documents and further answers to interrogatories pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff argues the defendant's production is incomplete. After careful review, the Motions to Compel (dkt. nos. 14 and 15) are DENIED. To the extent they seek information beyond the substantial document production and written answer to interrogatories, plaintiff's discove..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE A. O'TOOLE, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved to compel further production of documents and further answers to interrogatories pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff argues the defendant's production is incomplete.
After careful review, the Motions to Compel (dkt. nos. 14 and 15) are DENIED. To the extent they seek information beyond the substantial document production and written answer to interrogatories, plaintiff's discovery requests are overbroad, burdensome and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
It is SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
