CLAY v. COLVIN, 1:12CV1119. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150312d22
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER LORETTA C. BIGGS , District Judge . On February 9, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Plaintiff filed objections [Doc. #s 19, 21] within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 17), which is hereby affirmed and adopted. I
Summary: ORDER LORETTA C. BIGGS , District Judge . On February 9, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Plaintiff filed objections [Doc. #s 19, 21] within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 17), which is hereby affirmed and adopted. IT..
More
ORDER
LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge.
On February 9, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections [Doc. #s 19, 21] within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 17), which is hereby affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 15) is DENIED, the Commissioner's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 13) is GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
