Exzabrian W. v. Berryhill, 17-4688 (ADM/BRT). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20190109g18
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2019
Summary: Order ANN D. MONTGOMERY , District Judge . The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated December 20, 2018. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1.
Summary: Order ANN D. MONTGOMERY , District Judge . The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated December 20, 2018. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. P..
More
Order
ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson dated December 20, 2018. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following Order.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12) is GRANTED;
2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED; and
3. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (sentence four). Pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527, on remand the ALJ should evaluate the opinion of Paul Erickson, M.D. that Plaintiff has marked limitations in his ability to respond appropriately to work pressures in a usual work setting and give good reasons for the weight accorded to this treating physician's opinion. The ALJ should consider Dr. Erickson's opinion at steps three, four, and five of the sequential evaluation process.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
