EISSLER v. ALLIED WATERPROOFING, 393 S.W.3d 620 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco130701000345
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 12, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2013
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Claimant, Scott T. Eissler, appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the order of the Appeals Tribunal dismissing his appeal from the deputy's determination. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been fu
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Claimant, Scott T. Eissler, appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the order of the Appeals Tribunal dismissing his appeal from the deputy's determination. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been fur..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Claimant, Scott T. Eissler, appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the order of the Appeals Tribunal dismissing his appeal from the deputy's determination. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the order of Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
